Splicetoday

Writing
Oct 11, 2024, 06:24AM

Trolls Aren’t Worth the Energy

The older we are, the less energy we have to burn.

Troll modern.jpg?ixlib=rails 2.1

I have a little jar of wooden “fucks” that a friend sent me for Christmas last year. Each month I burn one during my semi-witchy little full moon ceremony when I write in my gratitude journal, set intentions, burn sage to clear out negative energy in my space. It’s a humorous, symbolic and energetic release of caring about the wrong shit each month. As I’ve gotten older, I realize there really are only so many things and people worthy of caring about.

I’ve written at Splice Today for over 12 years with over 500 pieces in addition to a long print and newspaper magazine career. During this time I published three novels and am currently working on two books: an essay collection and a memoir. I’ve never pretended to be anything I’m not and have often called myself a mediocre writer. Embracing mediocrity is a lifestyle because I believe lowering expectations leads to less disappointment and stress.

Lately my already-unheralded career has been questioned and I’ve received an onslaught of vicious comments from a hostile commenter on this site; more than I’ve collectively received throughout my previous 12 years. I wonder how much I’m supposed to care about this: I can report it isn’t much. I check in once a week to see his latest vitriolic ramblings. I’ve responded a few times because other commenters have also been dragged in, but the sort of barely-masked MAGA punching-down of me, my work and gender is worn-out, reflects on the stereotypical basement-dweller nature of this type of commenter. It’s not a battle worth fighting.

The American Psychological Association reports that “trolls are more likely to target members of nondominant groups, such as women, people of color, and LGBTQ+ people,” and although I’ve got no interest in playing a victim here and am essentially merely making observations, as a queer woman, I’m checking off two of those boxes so if we make an assumption that the commenter meets the troll profile, it’s not surprising. What’s the profile?

A Medium piece about online trolling leading to suicide cites narcissism as the origin of the trolls, stating it’s “the self-obsession, the feeling of self-importance, the desire to break others down and gain significance at the expense of others.”

My colleague Loren Kantor wrote an excellent piece called “Dealing With Online Trolls” where he breaks down the psychological traits of online troll commenters:

—They are typically male, internet-addicted and are at risk for becoming internet dependent.
—They have few offline friends and their online friends also engage in online harassment.
—They are plagued by immense feelings of inferiority, isolation, rage, paranoia and jealousy for peers.
—They are seeking attention and retribution for some unknown perceived injustice.
—They are developmentally immature, tend to be chronically isolated and have minimal to no intimate relationships.
—The anonymity of the internet contributes to disinhibition effect leading trolls to behave in asocial ways with a lack of guilt or remorse for the harm they cause.

That list remind you of anyone else besides our unfriendly neighborhood troll commenter here at Splice? Let’s just say there’s matching rageaholic gear; go chat with Tucker or awkwardly jump up and down on stage about it, what’s the point of the words you’re wasting, exactly? I promise I’m not losing any sleep, I’ve already burned that wooden “fuck.”

Kantor notes: “The moment you realize that trolls are mentally or emotionally disturbed, you understand the futility of countering them with rational or emotional pleas. The more rational you are, the more irrational a troll becomes. If you tell a troll he’s hurting your feelings, you reward him. He wants to inflict pain and misery. He’s an agent of chaos.”

I also wrote “Dear Cranky Commenter Troll” over a decade ago that’s still pretty accurate, and ended up with an entertaining section at a time when comments were more participatory (and in general less full of hate) than today. Although already scarce at one a month, the day that gets nearer all the time that, as the cliches go, I’ll run out of fucks to burn.

Discussion
  • For someone with no fucks left to burn, you sure do write about me a lot, albeit not in the least bit honestly. You don't back up even once, with evidence, any of your specious accusations against me, because you can't. An actual journalist would do so, instead of whining and looking for sympathy like you do, claiming that someone is picking on you because you are a queer woman.

    Responses to this comment
  • "I’ve responded a few times because other commenters have also been dragged in." Who dragged them in? "The sort of barely-masked MAGA punching-down of me, my work and gender is worn out." I've never mentioned your gender, didn't know you're queer, and I'm far from MAGA. If I'm lying please produce evidence of that. Don't worry, I know you can't. Victimhood is your thing. You should thank me for making it possible for you to write something easy like this, probably spending no more than an hour on it.

    Responses to this comment
  • "I check in once a week to see his latest vitriolic ramblings." Yet you claim to be "senior editor" of this publication? That's not credible.

    Responses to this comment
  • There's a different sort of trolling that I think you're not addressing. That's when someone is writing things that are totally false and with supreme confidence that they're right. There's no chance of changing those people's minds, but letting them go unanswered is unsatisfying - it leaves both the writer and their readers thinking that they are unopposed. In such a case, I like replying in a way that celebrates the opposing view - for example, never apologizing for dead Palestinian terrorists and the Palestinians they hid behind, or insisting that transwomen are nothing more than deluded men who must be kept out of women's single-sex spaces. There's nothing wrong with expressing hatred and disdain for people who are not only wrong, but wrong in a way that is destructive to society and civilization. You don't have to have psychological issues to do that; you just have to care to prevent lies from gaining more of a foothold than they already have.

    Responses to this comment
  • That's what I did. McCarthy wrote that Trump was convicted of rape, which is false because there are no convictions in civil court. She got her feathers ruffled and made up a bunch of stuff as a smokescreen, such as I'm a Trump fan( false), a misogynist (false), and a troll (false). She's unable to support any of these claims with actual evidence, so she goes on and on pretending to be a victim. All she had to do was correct her mistake and this would have been over like that. It's all about her ego.

    Responses to this comment

Register or Login to leave a comment