Splicetoday

Moving Pictures
Jul 14, 2026, 06:30AM

Black Helen

Not an outrage, not a good idea, just a tiresome third thing.

Images  15 .jpeg?ixlib=rails 2.1

“White-armed”? I haven’t read Homer, but an expert says that’s how Homer describes Helen of Troy. The expert also announces, “It’s worth noting that we actually have no idea what Helen looked like.” Aaron Sorkin asked me if he could step in and provide a rebuttal, so here it is: We have some idea. She had white arms, which means she was white and therefore not black. Not that casting Lupita Nyong’o, a black woman, in the upcoming film of The Odyssey is really such an awful thing. First, she’s a knockout, which is the character’s most important trait. Second, John Wayne played Genghis Khan and no lives were lost, so we can endure a Helen who is somehow 20 shades darker than everyone else in view. A bigger problem is the bigoted outrage, simultaneously pompous and hysterical, of Elon Musk and likeminded cretins online. But their brand of rabid stupidity has been denounced by plenty of people. My point is smaller and quieter. Casting a black woman as Helen doesn’t really make sense and we should be allowed to notice that.

The expert quoted above is Daniel Mendelsohn, a translator of The Odyssey. He discusses the Helen flap in a New York Times op-ed, but the article focuses more on Helen the character than it does the rights and wrongs of casting. The Times, unable to restrain itself, still swooped in with this headline: “Does Matt Damon Look Greek? No. So Stop Complaining About Lupita Nyong’o.” That command is echoed just once in Mendelsohn’s piece, where it’s voiced rather demurely. He uses parentheses to slip in the idea that the ancient Greeks, if they had the same idea of race that we do, “surely would object to the choice to cast the open-faced, all-American Matt Damon as the wily Mediterranean Odysseus.”

It’s just as well that he moves on to other themes. Being open-faced isn’t a racial attribute or a sign that a person can’t be cunning. Damon has light hair, but was that unknown in ancient Greece? Apollo, Jason, and Aphrodite were outright blonds. Given the thousands of years of various peoples washing across the Hellenic peninsula, Greeks today and Greeks then probably wouldn’t be a match. So Damon could be all right, but Nyong’o’s a stretch—a big one. Blacks weren’t a feature of ancient Greece and that’s the way it goes.

When not hyperventilating about Homer’s pissed-on grave and the death of Western civ, Nyong’o’s critics sometimes use the phrase: “takes me out of the story.” Her supporters fire back that The Odyssey has a giant with one eye, and men turning into pigs, and divine beings who toy with humanity, so who cares if a black character mysteriously crops up among whites? The answer is that the one-eyed giant and the divine beings and the rest are the story. We believe them because the resulting wonder and fun make their presence worthwhile; without them, without the wonder and fun, we just have a man who has trouble getting home. We’re supposed to notice that Cyclops is a giant with one eye. We’re not supposed to notice that black Helen is black, and that’s a big ask. It’s work that’s taxed from us so the film can be high-minded.

I’m happy to say that I’m going to see The Odyssey (second night because all the good seats were gone for the first). The hysterical right-wingers put the movie on my radar and after that curiosity took hold. I loved the story as a small boy and I want to see if its marvels survive in movie form. And by now I’ve developed a rooting interest, since I suspect the box office will pass a billion and make monkeys of the “woke, go broke” gang. Black Helen is nowhere near a deal breaker, as far as I’m concerned. But she’s a glitch, no more, no less, and I wish our society was racially sane enough to understand that.

Discussion
  • Well, why isn't Moana black too?

    Responses to this comment
  • I don’t get the outrage. If you want accurate and realistic depictions of the classics or history then read the classics or a history book or watch a good documentary.. Casting Lupita Nyong’o as Helen of Troy and Elliot Page as the Greek warrior Sinon represents an artistic boldness by the Odyssey director Christopher Nolan and it helps to break down the cultural and ethnic barriers in casting which has acted like a straightjacket to creative expression.. There are two stories from history that I would love to see make it to the big screen. The first would be the story of the underground railroad. For the central character of the film Harriet Tubman I would cast the talented Oscar winning actress Gwyneth Paltrow who’s expressive and emotional acting style would allow her to capture the essence of the struggles of that part of the abolition movement.. The other story from history that I would love to see made in to a film would be The Lewis and Clark Expedition where I would cast Will Smith as Merriweather Lewis and Cuba Gooding jr. as William Clark. For the role of Sacagawea I would cast Sydney Sweeney although I would consider Lupita Nyong’o for that role as well. There could also be a role for Elliot Page perhaps as one of the Sioux Indian chiefs that Lewis and Clark meet during their expedition west...We could be headed for a creative and exciting period in the film industry!

    Responses to this comment
  • For a puzzled Doublesea: It's all abt the default. The default used to be white, now it's being changed to white+ (meaning mainly whites + some others). A story abt South Seas islanders isn't meant to be the default, so the emphasis is on getting a cast that matches the ethnic background being featured.

    Responses to this comment
  • For Crestrider with his playful suggestions: same point.

    Responses to this comment
  • So you are quoting Aaron Sorkin here after you agreed to let him chime in? Or did I miss something?

    Responses to this comment
  • Looks like that was too cute. I'm using one of Sorkin's signature gimmicks ("We know nothing x. "We know something x," with "something" in ital). So I acknowledge as much by pretending that it's him speaking, like he'd been standing by and wanted to join in. I still like the idea but it seems to invite confusion.

    Responses to this comment
  • Have never seen anyone try as hard as Crestrider does in the comments section here, or anywhere, on a regular basis. It's impressive. A+ for effort!

    Responses to this comment
  • I appreciate that childe_harold! As usual you are spot on with your takes...

    Responses to this comment
  • I’m not exactly sure what point CTMAY1 is making regarding the confusing default ramble from the previous comment “The default used to be white, now it has been changed to white+ (meaning mainly whites + some others).” Should the default not be objective truth meaning depicting stories from history and literature as accurately and realistically as possible which would include the casting decisions? If objective truth is not the default in filmmaking than anything goes including the casting suggestions I made in my earlier comment on this post which was intended to be farcical but actually sounds possible the way movies are headed.

    Responses to this comment
  • For historical accuracy, they should have done her up in whiteface, like the Wayans brothers wore in “White Chicks”. Now THAT would have made things interesting!

    Responses to this comment
  • By "the default" I mean the racial mix that's presented to audiences as normal. Moana isn't supposed to show the default, it's supposed to show people of the South Seas.. // You attach an argument to your complaint abt being puzzled. So let's take a look. That moviemakers, by default, should always follow truth and accuracy may strike you as obvious. But it hasn't been obvious to moviemakers or their audiences. Surprised that you never noticed. .

    Responses to this comment
  • As a lifelong movie enthusiast I am well aware of the long history of filmmakers inaccurate and unrealistic casting decisions be it your example of John Wayne playing Genghis Khan in ‘The Conqueror’ or virtually all of the Chinese characters in ‘The Adventures of Marco Polo’ being played by white actors with eye makeup to make them look asian or [The Rifleman] Chuck Conners playing Geronimo and there are numerous other examples one could give from films of the past. The big difference between the Odyssey which was released last week in 2026 and the three aforementioned films which were released in 1956, 1938 and 1962 is that we have culturally evolved and overcome many of the biases that were present in those times. Also today we have a large supply of English speaking actors of all ethnicities to play any role to accurately depict figures in history or characters from literature. The obvious and logical reason why Cristopher Nolan cast Lupita Nyong’o and Elliot Page is to meet the Academy Awards diversity standards to be eligible for a best picture nomination. Nolan being the astute director that he is knows how to play the game and he knows that a best picture nomination and perhaps an Oscar equates to a huge bump in future movie sales, increased profits and more notoriety for him. To put it another way film realism and accuracy has been sacrificed on the alter of DEI and future revenue...Having said all that I plan on seeing the Odyssey this weekend and being a half glass full person when it comes to movies I suspect I will like the movie a lot and I don’t think the miscasting decisions will lessen my enjoyment of it.

    Responses to this comment
  • Skimming your work I caught this: "he obvious and logical reason why Cristopher Nolan cast Lupita Nyong’o and Elliot Page is to meet the Academy Awards diversity standards to be eligible for a best picture nomination." The standards don't require members of the cast to be nonwhite; a few people behind the scenes will do the trick.

    Responses to this comment
  • Why hire a few diverse people behind the scenes when you can be up front about it and draw attention to your film. Christopher Nolan's casting decisions have sent a loud and clear signal to the Academy Awards that he is on team DEI which they put high value on. When it comes time for best picture nominations he's a certain lock and his DEI bona fides will play well for him on Oscar night.

    Responses to this comment
  • So you didn't know that she wasn't needed to meet the requirements.

    Responses to this comment
  • I was aware of the academy award diversity requirements. I am not aware of. who Christopher Nolan has on his film production team behind the scenes as it pertains to diversity. I do know that Nolan made a big splash with the casting of Page and Nyong'o and the DEI obsessed academy awards will reward him for it.

    Responses to this comment
  • You got to be more careful about what you think you know.

    Responses to this comment
  • You got to be more careful about obtusely rambling on.

    Responses to this comment
  • Just rude, and look up ramble.

    Responses to this comment
  • I apologize for coming across as offensive. My intention was not to be rude just descriptive. Obtusely rambling on means "speaking or writing in a way that is slow to understand, often missing the main point or being unnecessarily complicated." A case in point from your earlier comment " It’s all abt the default. The default used to be white, now it’s being changed to white+ (meaning mainly whites + some others)." This completely misses the point. The reason for the casting of Elliot Page and Lupita Nyong'o is clearly a virtue signal to the Academy Awards while also complying with their DEI standards. Their castings certainly were not because they were the most suitable actors to accurately depict the characters they were playing in the Odyssey. For you not to recognize or admit to this point but instead to deflect from what is obvious is by definition obtuse..

    Responses to this comment
  • No. Assertion isn't proof and disagreeing with you isn't being obtuse. That's my last word, you may now have yours.

    Responses to this comment
  • Putting the disagreements in the comments section aside this is a well written and interesting article. I probably should have led my first comment with that fact. That is my last word.

    Responses to this comment
  • A very handsome way to wind up the debate -- thanks.

    Responses to this comment

Register or Login to leave a comment