Splicetoday

Digital
Apr 15, 2025, 06:29AM

What I Got Right and Wrong

Tracking my views and how they’ve held up. From Biden to Trump, science, alliances and AI.

Earth around us first photograph nasa apollo8 dec24 earthrise.jpg?ixlib=rails 2.1

It’s good to follow up on things one’s written, assessing what was right or wrong, and what’s changed since. Here are some thoughts along those lines:

Biden wasn’t a super ager. I wrote in February 2024 that Joe Biden might be a “cognitive super ager,” one of those people who “markedly defy expectations of cognitive decline.” His performance in the June debate convinced me he’d lost mental agility and physical stamina to a degree that running for re-election was folly; I called for Kamala Harris to become the candidate, and soon after hoped Biden would resign. If I’d known that Barack Obama didn’t think she could win, I’d have wanted a mini-primary or open convention (though Biden passing the presidency to her would’ve still been a good move).

Trump’s authoritarianism is even worse than I thought. During the campaign, I worried that Donald Trump “relentlessly seeks to degrade institutions into subservience to his untrammeled personal interests, and chose a running mate who’s stated he’d have abetted overturning an election, including by disregarding the Supreme Court.” I noted: “Various putative checks and balances, from Congress, the judiciary, state governments or non-governmental entities, have weaknesses that a determined autocrat could overcome. A particular concern is that an executive branch ignoring court orders—precisely what [J.D.] Vance has advocated—doesn’t have any clear countermeasure in our system.”

Those concerns were valid, but the reality’s gone beyond them. I didn’t anticipate, for example, that the administration would send people to a torture prison in a foreign dictatorship, based on uncorroborated suspicions of gang membership and a bogus claim the gang’s engaged in government-backed hostilities (though I intuited that the “invasion” rhetoric could lead to some kind of authoritarian measure). I anticipated that Trump would be vindictive toward various critics and enemies, but didn’t expect executive orders targeting specific organizations and individuals in a way that defiles the Constitution.

American science is in trouble. My science coverage didn’t anticipate the turmoil and repression the second Trump administration would bring to science, with massive budget cuts, layoffs, and assaults on academic freedom and the integrity of federal research. The U.S. has been the world leader in science, with vast economic and technological benefits, since World War II, and that status is now in jeopardy.

So are America’s alliances. I anticipated that America’s alliances would weaken in a second Trump term, though I didn’t imagine the degree of breakdown signified by hostile American claims against Greenland and Canada. The economic and geopolitical tumult of Trump’s tariff war surprised me as well.

AI: Still not sure how transformative. My articles on artificial intelligence have expressed ambivalence about its impact, plus some skepticism about claims AI will transform the world or destroy humanity. A new analysis, called AI 2027, anticipating intense—possibly apocalyptic—change in the next few years, strikes me as overblown. Still, I wouldn’t be inclined to place bets on possible AI developments.

Space: Reflecting problems on Earth. I recently wrote for The Unpopulist about pressures toward autocracy and oligarchy in space, noting that this was a turn from my 1990s optimism about the liberatory potential of space technology and prospective colonies. My Splice Today pieces on space over the years have been more restrained in their ebullience, though only gradually reflecting a disillusionment, in particular with Elon Musk and his dubious plans and conflicts of interest.

Back to Earth, and going back a few years, I was wrong to see the prospective 2020 election as “Twilight of a Right-Wing Era” or to be confident that “Trump Will Leave If He Loses.” But I was ahead of the curve in praising “The Merits of Standardized Tests,” before the backlash against them had subsided. I’ve now written over 250 articles for Splice Today, somewhere around 200,000 words; some right, some wrong.

—Kenneth Silber is author of In DeWitt’s Footsteps: Seeing History on the Erie Canal. Follow him on Bluesky

Discussion
  • Adding to your list, you (for whatever weird reason) stalked my Twitter interactions with @noahpinion, just like would-be cancellers have been doing for years now, and falsely claimed that I called him a "commie." Your Biden claim was insane to anyone who'd observed him. This one is just creepy.

    Responses to this comment
  • "My argument isn't even from the commie perspective, but you go with that one! Yours is, however." https://x.com/SubBeck/status/1638377114519982080 I was entirely correct in what I wrote at https://www.splicetoday.com/politics-and-media/living-on-the-dark-end-of-the-street#comment_29517 not only that you referred to his "commie perspective" but that you claimed later that you'd had no disagreement with him.

    Responses to this comment
  • Ken, sorry to be mean, but are you so dumb you can't see that Noah is the one who called ME a commie? I'll quote him for you: "That is exactly my argument. Get the hell outta my grill, commie weirdo!" If you're going to be a weirdo and stalk my Twitter for reasons only you know, at least get your facts straight, Fact Man.

    Responses to this comment
  • You have serious reading comprehension issues, buddy. After Noah called ME a commie, this was my reply: "My argument isn't even from the commie perspective, but you go with that one! Yours is, however." It's all right there in the link you provided in your "defense." Do you actually believe that I was referring to HIS "commie perspective"? If so, you're about as cognitively sound as your man, Old Joe. Maybe time to take that cognitive test Trump just took. When you made this false, silly accusation, even though I didn't recall the details of that conversation with Noah, I knew you were lying because I don't ever call people commies, unless it's facetious.

    Responses to this comment
  • Here's the link to Noah's tweet calling me a "commie weirdo." https://x.com/Noahpinion/status/1638375820421939200

    Responses to this comment
  • BTW, you lied about me calling Noah a commie after you'd already written a performative piece declaring you'd left Twitter, but then claimed you found an old "backup" Twitter account you used to stalk my Twitter. This is all pretty embarrassing, unprofessional stuff.

    Responses to this comment

Register or Login to leave a comment