Does Dakota Johnson always suck the life out of everything she is in?

Having school dates available ahead of time really helps families prepare for the academic year. A comprehensive school calendar is a simple but valuable planning tool.

Hey I like the Athletic.

Murphy is set to do a series about Lindsay Clancy in 2027.

Soundboard Ultra is a fun meme soundboard with a great collection of viral meme sounds and sound effects. Easy to use and perfect for quick laughs!https://soundboardultra.com/

SoundboardCrazy is a fun platform for discovering popular meme sounds and funny audio clips. The meme soundboard collection is easy to explore and works well for entertainment and content creation.https://soundboardcrazy.com/

The 140-character limit shows how useful constraints can be for keeping digital communication focused; similarly, tracking everyday essentials benefits from concise, timely information like egg rate today for practical context. https://eggratelab.com/

The article makes a strong case that creative expression often benefits from tight constraints, much like the quick reactions and recognizable moments that work well with a meme soundboard. Short formats can make digital communication more distinctive and memorable. https://soundbuttonsmax.com/

The article makes a strong case that Twitter’s 140-character limit was part of what made the platform distinctive, much like the concise, instantly recognizable reactions found through sonidos botones in online conversations. https://sonidosbotones.com/

All this stuff about Hollywood! How boring. You should really be writing about how your aristocratic ancestors escaped being poulet a la moutard during the French Revolution. https://chaucer.fas.harvard.edu/pages/reynard-and-chanticleer

The 140-character limit worked because the constraint encouraged sharper writing and made Twitter feel distinct from other platforms; that same brevity also explains why botones de sonidos can complement quick, expressive online interactions. https://botonesdesonidos.com/

Yes SuperFans, I know: it's Kaley Cuoco.

Since you love links so much, here's one of your boy Tucker Carlson talking about how the Nazis didn't want to go to war with Britain. He also said that the British fighting the Nazis had been a waste of time. You have the best sources! https://x.com/MaxNordau/status/2106119587385213215?s=20 If you don't know how to follow this link you can copy and paste it into your browser.

Wait, did you actually quote Tucker Carlson here? That's a good one!

Nobody reads links in the comments section. You and one other person who posts here are the only ones I've seen post them. Are you really unable you explain, in your own words, why the Gazans' own Muslim neighbors won't take them in? Egypt won't even allow a refugee camp on its side of the border despite all the misery in Gaza. And do you have any idea why Hamas scrubbed its charter to refer to zionists rather than Jews? Because they have no problem with Jews, only zionists? What a laugh. Do you actually think this change in their charter makes Jews safer in Gaza? Is it possible that you're that out of it? Have you even talked to any Jews in Israel to ask them about their thoughts about walking down the street in Gaza? Can you get that information in all of your links? I see you want to change the topic to IDF military attacks in Gaza, which is another topic altogether, and one that I didn't address. Yeah, the two sides have been at war and they attack each other. I'm sorry, but you being English is neither here nor there. It doesn't make you right. That's a logical fallacy known as appeal to authority. You should know that, CJ. I don't care if you grew up with it. What we're talking about is the immediate response after Oct. 7, not what the BBC reported when you were 15. Over the years, some former BBC executives and presenters (such as former news director Helen Boaden former director-general Mark Thompson, and former presenter Andrew Marr) have acknowledged past instances of an unconscious "liberal groupthink" or cultural slant within the BBC. That's what you grew up with too. Nobody says the BBC has gotten more conservative, because it hasn't. You also don't know, as you claim, both sides of the debate. Your views are not balanced in the least. I'm sure if I bothered to follow all of your links that nobody will click on I would see the bias of your sources. For example, the Centre for Media Monitoring is politically motivated activist group with a left-leaning/Islamist bias.

I recommended one link in particular. It refutes one of your specific points, that the Gazans are inherently violent people. The Hamas charter was altered in 2017 and refers to the Zionist project rather than Jews. Meanwhile, in the same period, Israel made several intentional forays into Gaza in operations it referred to as "mowing the lawn". It's intention was to kill Gaza citizens. Here is a list of attacks upon Gaza from 1956 till the present: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_Israeli_attacks_on_the_Gaza_Strip The whole of my piece is a refutation of the things you wrote, with links to evidence, but, just to take one of your points: the difference between us (aside from the fact that I'm aware of the arguments of both sides in this debate, while you only know one) is that I'm English. I know the BBC very well. I've grown up with it. The fact that people complained about it from both sides is neither here nor there. According to one report: "Analysis of 35,000+ pieces of BBC content shows Israeli deaths given 33 times more coverage, per fatality, and significantly more emotive language." The report is by the Centre for Media Monitoring dated 16th June 2025. Here's the link: https://cfmm.org.uk/resource/bbc-on-gaza-israel-one-story-double-standards/ If you don't know how to follow a link in the comments, simply highlight and click. Happy reading.

I recommended one link in particular. It refutes one of your specific points, that the Gazans are inherently violent people. The Hamas charter was altered in 2017 and refers to the Zionist project rather than Jews. Meanwhile, in the same period, Israel made several intentional forays into Gaza in operations it referred to as "mowing the lawn". It's intention was to kill Gaza citizens. Here is a list of attacks upon Gaza from 1956 till the present: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_Israeli_attacks_on_the_Gaza_Strip The whole of my piece is a refutation of the things you wrote, with links to evidence, but, just to take one of your points: the difference between us (aside from the fact that I'm aware of the arguments of both sides in this debate, while you only know one) is that I'm English. I know the BBC very well. I've grown up with it. The fact that people complained about it from both sides is neither here nor there. According to one report: "Analysis of 35,000+ pieces of BBC content shows Israeli deaths given 33 times more coverage, per fatality, and significantly more emotive language." The report is by the Centre for Media Monitoring dated 16th June 2025. Here's the link: https://cfmm.org.uk/resource/bbc-on-gaza-israel-one-story-double-standards/ If you don't know how to follow a link in the comments, simply highlight and click. Happy reading.

You havent refuted a single thing I wrote.

You put about 50 links into this piece. You actually think I'm going to click on them???

Over the last 20 years (2006–2026), walking in Gaza has been fundamentally impossible and profoundly life-threatening for any Jew or Israeli citizen. Hamas's founding charter openly targeted Jews, making any intentional or accidental entry by a Jewish person equivalent to a capture or execution scenario. Do you truly not understand this, CJ? Because a handful of anti-zionist Jews have been allowed into Gaza for political purposes, you actually believe that any Jew could walk down the street there? They could do it as long as their goal was to commit suicide. There's a lot of things the sources you rely on don't tell you. You sound a lot like Roger Waters.

Chris, you're right, of course. The piece was written with you in mind. You obviously didn't read it all though, as there's a third quote from you which you didn't mention: the blood libel that Jews would only have to step into Gaza to be slaughtered. You'll also find several refutations of your point of view, with links, which an honest investigator would want to follow, just to find out what the other side are saying. Go on. Be brave. Test your belief system against actual evidence. I particularly recommend Dr Maynard's testimony. As you so rightly say: "you see what you want to see."

PS. Your confused essay was based on what you claim was BBC's bias against the Palestinians. After Oct 7, the BBC received thousands of complaints split evenly down the middle—with half alleging anti-Israel bias and the other half alleging anti-Palestinian bias. But you see what you want to see.

Okay, CJ, I can see you’re eager to revive this. You just can’t let it go. Most people would not want to call attention, so long after the fact, to writing what you wrote, for obvious reasons. Best thing to do in these situations is to let it fade away. Anyway, I wrote the two comments that upset you so. I really don’t know what kind of reaction you expect to get after comparing Israel to a famous pedophile nine days after the October 7 atrocities. Maybe you just live in your own world and can’t see how twisted you sounded. And, yes, writing such things will get you accused of antisemitism, even though such suggestions seem to shock you. So it upset you that I said no neighboring countries will take in any Gazans? You ask if they’re perceived as violent, as if that’s absurd. Yes, they are considered violent. Do you dispute the claim that their neighbors won’t take them in, or claim that there’s another reason for not taking them in? Please educate us. You purposefully obscure things by saying many Gazans don’t want to be removed from Gaza, even though you know that’s a different topic.The ones who might want to move out can’t do it because their fellow Muslims don’t want them.It’s amusing that you think that your claim about the IDF is the only factual error in your piece. You talk about the “cold and calculated” violence perpetrated by Israel while characterizing the October 7th attack “in the heat of the moment.” Can you really be serious? October 7 had been planned for at least a year. That sure was one long “moment.” This is how propagandists write.

I like websites that keep result-related information easy to access. kolkata ff is a useful option for users who want quick updates in one place.

There is an Aimee Mann station on Siriusxm https://www.siriusxm.com/player/artist-station/entity/6b19da47-a7c4-3fe8-a8a7-8811926473b9

One of the musicians to have actually appeared - as herself - in "Buffy, The Vampire Slayer."

I really enjoyed the interview. Great job making Johns feel comfortable while asking interesting questions, both technical and "spiritual". Will hunt down the book. 🙂

On "Coffee with Scott Adams" today (11/11) Scott Adams says, in discussing how to persuade people, you should watch Cheryl Hines on podcasts, and in particular this episode, if you want to know how to be on a podcast.

That and GQ?

I think seeing The Sting as a young teen or pre-teen helped turn me gay. THAT was a hot couple!

Trump has won twice, but neither of these guys have the slightest idea of why that happened. Try harder, Splice Today.

Hard to imagine thinking that Marc Maron has any real insights into the future of American politics. He's a good comedian and decent interviewer, but his talent stops there. And in this clip, he's talking to a fellow insufferably smug progressive, Sam Seder, who hasn't had an original thought in decades. Posting such material is a total waste of time. Thanks for nothing.

Actually the second littlest one was not her son because he was younger than my dad, i unfortunately don’t remember which cousin he was but the tallest boy was my great aunt’s son.

They are not going to school, my grandfather filmed this. It was a leisurely trip to the end of the line by lake Roland. The little blondie in white was my dad and the dark haired second tallest boy in stripes was my uncle. The lady that was on camera before they boarded was my aunt Bea and the two other boys I think were her sons

Such a great song. So sad youngin's don't know our music in the 60's and 70's was SO much better than their music is.

"If you only know a cup this way, you don't know the cup." David Thomas threw off sparks every time he opened his mouth.